From c5be1a98ba4c82495ef5b542833657b9ae8bb164 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon De Backer <simondebacker@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 23:01:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix deprecated QRegExp

Use QRegularExpression instead.

https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qregularexpression.html#notes-for-qregexp-users

This function was introduced in Qt 5
---
 sources/autoNum/numerotationcontext.cpp | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sources/autoNum/numerotationcontext.cpp b/sources/autoNum/numerotationcontext.cpp
index 1f932e9fa..a94fe7ec9 100644
--- a/sources/autoNum/numerotationcontext.cpp
+++ b/sources/autoNum/numerotationcontext.cpp
@@ -16,9 +16,10 @@
 	along with QElectroTech.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
 */
 #include "numerotationcontext.h"
+#include "qet.h"
 
 #include <utility>
-#include "qet.h"
+#include <QRegularExpression>
 
 /**
 	Constructor
@@ -141,7 +142,7 @@ QString NumerotationContext::validRegExpNumber() const
 */
 bool NumerotationContext::keyIsAcceptable(const QString &type) const
 {
-	return (type.contains(QRegExp(validRegExpNum())));
+	return (type.contains(QRegularExpression(validRegExpNum())));
 }
 
 /**
@@ -150,7 +151,7 @@ bool NumerotationContext::keyIsAcceptable(const QString &type) const
 */
 bool NumerotationContext::keyIsNumber(const QString &type) const
 {
-	return (type.contains(QRegExp(validRegExpNumber())));
+	return (type.contains(QRegularExpression(validRegExpNumber())));
 }
 
 /**