Review of #1272: scorpio810 asked for a warning box for users; the inline
box added in 9a55939bb is replaced by a pop-up, as the element editor
gives for unnamed terminals. When OK in Settings > General or in Project
properties turns a rule on (a limit where there was none, or one wire
per folio report), a warning says the rules are experimental, may change
with settings to redo if wires and conductors become separate objects,
and can all be turned off in Settings > General. OK goes on. Changing a
limit that was already on, or turning rules off, shows nothing.
tst_wiringrules: when the warning is due (WiringRules::turnsRuleOn()).
Checked in the GUI from both pages, and that a plain OK shows nothing.
English for translators: "Warning"; "The wires-per-terminal rules are an
experimental feature. They count wires as QElectroTech represents them
today. They could change, and your settings need redoing, if wires and
conductors become separate objects in a future version. All these rules
can be turned off in Configure QElectroTech > General."
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015FPuYPS4T7QuEwjNu22rXD
Review of #1272 (scorpio810, after arummler's note that the rules would
need redesigning if wires and conductors become separate objects): a
warning box, with the standard warning icon, at the top of the rules in
Settings > General and in Project properties. It says the feature is
experimental, counts wires as QElectroTech models them today, and that
the rules, and the user's settings, could change if wires and conductors
are separated.
English for translators: "Experimental feature. These rules count wires
as QElectroTech represents them today; they could change, and your
settings need redoing, if wires and conductors become separate objects
in a future version."
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015FPuYPS4T7QuEwjNu22rXD
ispyisail