Every tr() source string in the code and the forms is now the English
text, and French is a translation (qet_fr.ts) like the other languages.
Generated, not hand-edited: master ef795a21e5 converted by
qet-en-source (harness 4c4ddc9).
3144 messages get an English source, 665 already had one, 0 left French; 8 shared-wording pairs disambiguated.
C++: 2904 literals in 233 files. Forms: 809 strings in 65 files. All 34 .ts files re-keyed; qet_fr.ts filled.
lupdate check: PASS. What each of 38 languages shows, old vs new: same 118266, English instead of French 38433, comment fallback 51, differences 0.
Review of #1205:
- The scene gives no order for its selection, so the "first" wire whose
values the panel shows could change between two selections of the
same wires. The wires are now sorted top to bottom, then left to right.
- A text field the selected wires do not agree on (function, section,
cable...) is shown blank with the hint "Plusieurs valeurs". Typing any
value there, including the first wire's own, now differs from what was
shown, so it reaches every wire: 1.5 mm² on a 1.5 and a 2.5 wire works.
- The conductor text is locked while several wires are selected: the same
number on all of them would make duplicates. "Apply to all conductors
of this potential" with one wire selected still sets the number on the
whole potential.
- One edit of N wires emitted N signals, each reloading the panel. They
are now gathered into one reload, which matters since a reload reads
every selected wire to find the mixed fields. Selections and targets
are de-duplicated with sets, and a wire reached through an earlier
wire's potential is not walked again. An edit that changes nothing
returns before any potential is walked.
The rules move to sources/conductormultiedit.h, templates over the wire
type, so tst_conductormultiedit can check them against a fake wire:
order, targets with and without potentials, one undo step and its redo
for three wires, and the mixed fields. tst_conductorapplychanges now
gives the other wire the opposite value in every boolean field, so
copying one by mistake fails the test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>