Bug #331: "Il serait intéressant de pouvoir directement dans la fenêtre
'Sélection numérotation auto' modifier la valeur d'incrément et visualiser
la prochaine numérotation qui sera appliquée. Ceci sans être obligé
d'ouvrir la page de configuration."
The dock (AutoNumberingDockWidget) already let you see and edit a rule's
*current* value inline (added in 52c8ef6b4/031710b5f/ee4ba82d2). The
increment itself, and any preview of where the numbering is headed, was
reachable only through Configurer -> the full project-properties dialog.
Two new widgets per row (conductor/element/folio):
- An increment spin box, read from and written to the same NumerotationContext
field NumPartEditorW's increase_spinBox already edits in the full dialog --
same data, second place to reach it.
- A read-only next-value field, computed via
NumerotationContextCommands::next() -- the identical engine the "Suivant"
button in the full dialog already uses to step a whole context. Reusing it
rather than reimplementing the arithmetic means wrap-and-carry between parts
comes out identical to what actually happens when the number is next
consumed, and zero-padding matches real rendering
(NumerotationContext::formatValue(), mirroring
autonum::setSequentialToList()'s padding rule by hand since that function is
local to assignvariables.cpp).
NumerotationContext gains replaceIncrease(index, increase), a sibling to the
existing replaceValue() that touches only the increment field.
Every refresh call site in the file (13 of them) previously refreshed just the
value field; they now go through a new refreshRow(category), which refreshes
value + increment + next-value-preview together via a small per-row widget
bundle (rowFor()). This also let resetAutoNum()'s three-way switch collapse to
one line, and refreshValueFields()'s three near-identical blocks collapse to a
loop -- both existing before this change, not new here.
Verified live under Xvfb: created an element numbering rule "K" (Chiffre 1,
value 1, increment 1) via the full dialog, confirmed the dock showed
Valeur=1/Incrément=1/Suivant=2. Changed the dock's own Incrément to 3 --
Suivant updated live to 4, no dialog needed. Changed Valeur to 10 -- Suivant
became 13. Reopened the full configuration dialog and confirmed it read back
the same value_field=10/increase_spinBox=3, i.e. the round trip through
replaceIncrease()/storeContext() does not disturb type, initial value, modulus
or format.
Builds clean, CMake/Ninja Release, Qt 5.15, 820/820, no new warnings.
Fixes: https://qelectrotech.org/bugtracker/view.php?id=331
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A cyclic part could only ever be rendered at its natural width, which is
fine for one of @scorpio810's two real layouts and wrong for the other:
April 5000/2000, 32-point cards %IX0.0 .. %IX0.31, then %IX1.0
Schneider M340, 64-point cards I1.00 .. I1.63, then I2.00
The first wants no padding, the second wants two digits. Since the two
conflict, the width cannot be derived from the modulus or from the part
type -- it has to be the user's to set.
Add a format field holding a run of zeros, the same convention a
spreadsheet uses for integer padding: "00" renders 7 as 07, "000" as 007.
The field's length is the minimum number of digits. It applies to every
numeric part type, not only cyclic ones, so "Chiffre 01" can be widened
past two digits without inventing another type for it.
An empty mask means the part type's own natural width, so it reproduces
exactly what every existing context does today -- Chiffre 1 stays 7,
Chiffre 01 stays 07, Chiffre 001 stays 007. That is what makes this safe
for existing projects: absent is the default, and absent changes nothing.
Stored as a sixth field on the context part and as an XML attribute
written only when set, following how modulus was added: readers guard on
size() and treat a short item as "no format". All seven places that
rebuild a part while incrementing it now carry the format through --
missing one would have silently dropped the padding on the second element
numbered.
The editor field is restricted to zeros by a validator, and is enabled
only for types that render as a number.
Measured:
April, mask empty %IX0.29 %IX0.30 %IX0.31 %IX1.0 %IX1.1
M340, mask "00" I1.00 I1.01 ... I1.62 I1.63 I2.00 I2.01
no mask unit 7,8,9 ten 07,08,09 hundred 007,008,009
ten with mask "0000" 0007 0008 0009
Adds a configurable wrap-at-N counter type to the autonumbering engine
(NumerotationContext + NumerotationContextCommands), covering PLC/rack-style
addressing conventions like "e0.0...e0.7, e1.0...e1.7" (8 channels per
card) generally, rather than hardcoding octal specifically.
- New "wrap" part type (WrapNum, alongside the existing UnitNum/TenNum/
HundredNum strategies) stores a modulus in addition to the existing
value/increase/initialvalue fields. Its own next()/previous() only wraps
its own value modulo the configured modulus -- carrying into (or
borrowing from) the adjacent part requires visibility across parts,
which only the composition loop has.
- NumerotationContextCommands::next()/previous() gained carry()/borrow()
helpers: when a wrap part's own next() would reach/exceed its modulus
(or go below 0 on previous()), the nearest preceding numeric part is
bumped by exactly one unit, skipping non-numeric parts (e.g. a "."
string separator). Wrap parts chain correctly if adjacent (e.g. seconds
wrapping into minutes wrapping into hours).
- For the leading part of a wrap-and-carry pair to stay fixed except when
carried into (i.e. actually produce "e0.0...e0.7, e1.0..." rather than
advancing on every step under its own strategy), its own increase must
be 0. The increase spinbox's minimum was 1, which made this
configuration impossible through the UI -- lowered to 0 and documented
with a tooltip, since this wasn't obvious from the UI alone.
- NumerotationContext gained a 5th pipe-separated field (modulus) in its
serialized string form, defaulting to 0 (non-wrapping) for every
existing part type; toXml()/fromXml() persist it as a "modulus" XML
attribute the same way "initialvalue" is already persisted for
unitfolio/tenfolio/hundredfolio.
- New "Cyclique (modulo)" entry in the part-type dropdown (numparteditorw),
available for element, conductor, and folio autonumbering alike, since
all three already go through NumerotationContextCommands.
Verified in the running app via the numbering config dialog's own
Suivant/Précédent buttons (which call the production
NumerotationContextCommands::next()/previous() directly): a two-part
context (unit, increase=0 + wrap mod 8) produced exactly
e0.0→...→e0.7→e1.0→...→e1.7 on repeated "next", and the exact reverse
(with correct borrowing) on repeated "previous".
ispyisail