QET::splitWithSpaces() split on QRegularExpression("[^\\]?(?:\\\\)* ").
That is not a valid pattern: "[^\\]" opens a character class whose "\\]" is
an escaped bracket, so the class is never closed. QRegularExpression
reported isValid() == false, QString::split() warned "invalid
QRegularExpression object", and the function returned an EMPTY list for
every input.
It is the receiving half of the SingleApplication handshake: a secondary
instance sends "launched-with-args: " + joinWithSpaces(args) (main.cpp) and
the running instance parses it in QETApp::receiveMessage() before calling
openFiles(). With the split always empty, the running instance received no
arguments at all -- so opening a project while QET was already running
silently did nothing.
The bug is reported against filenames containing spaces, which is how it
was noticed, but it is not limited to them: plain names failed identically.
A corrected regex is not available. The separator is a space preceded by an
even-length run of backslashes, and PCRE2 has no variable-length lookbehind,
so the run cannot be expressed in a lookbehind and anything that matches it
by consumption eats the character before the space -- which is what the
"[^\\]?" was for. Scanning the string explicitly is correct and easier to
read.
tests/qttest/tst_qetstrings.cpp asserts the round trip
splitWithSpaces(joinWithSpaces(x)) == x over plain names, embedded spaces,
embedded backslashes, a trailing backslash and a mixture, plus the specific
regression that a plain argument list does not come back empty.
Verified the test fails without the fix: 9 of 11 cases fail on the old
implementation and all 11 pass with it. Full suite 5/5, Qt 5.15.18.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A slave and a terminal are both routinely separately orderable hardware. A
circuit breaker can carry ten or twenty auxiliary blocks, each with its own
order code, and a terminal block is a purchased part in its own right.
Neither was reaching the bill of materials.
Decided in discussion #847: @IBSYSLevi -- "I would not expect that a defined
piece of hardware is excluded from BOM when not specifically defined as so" --
with use cases from @jozi332 covering Siemens breakers with ten to twenty
auxiliary blocks and PLC cards carrying per-channel data.
Two filters had to change, which is easy to miss: BomExport::defaultQuery()
and, upstream of it, the WHERE clause of element_nomenclature_view itself.
Changing only the query does nothing for slaves, because the view had already
removed them. Terminals were already in the view, so they appeared as soon as
the query allowed them -- which made a half-finished change look like it had
worked.
Measured on examples/industrial.qet, which holds 96 terminals and 41 slaves:
258 rows before, 354 with terminals, 395 with both. A slave given a
manufacturer and part number now appears in the export; previously it could
not, at any setting.
Nothing that should stay out of a bill of materials is newly included. The
folio report arrows and the conductor definition are still excluded because
they are not hardware, and anything else -- a relay's own auxiliary contact,
which is not orderable separately -- is kept out with exclude_from_bom, which
the view already honours and which #721 and #765 made settable on the symbol
itself.
tst_smart_device is updated rather than weakened. @enesgursoy6110 wrote it in
#830 to prove the filter works, inserting rows designated "Must not be
exported"; the slave and terminal rows now carry real designations and are
asserted present, and a folio report arrow takes over as the negative case,
so the test still proves filtering happens -- at the boundary we now want.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Second half of #819: where a coil declares what contacts it provides, the
General tab now reports each type as used against declared rather than as
a bare count.
NO : 3/4, NC : 1/2, inverseurs : 0/1, autres : 0/0
MasterElement::contactCapacity() sums contactCount over the element's
SlaveContactGroup list, per type, reusing the same ContactUsage tally the
used count is built on. The mapping from ElementData::SlaveState onto the
tally's own type is factored into one helper so the used count and the
declared capacity cannot classify a contact differently.
Falls back to the plain count from the previous commit when an element
declares no groups, which is every element in the standard collection
today -- nothing in the corpus declares slaveContactGroups, so this
changes no existing display.
A type used beyond what is declared reads as e.g. "1/0". That is
deliberate: it says this contact does not fit the part.
Display only. Whether a declared capacity should also feed
MasterElement::isFull() is the open question in #819 and is not touched
here.
Verified end to end against a purpose-built fixture, since no existing
element exercises this path: a coil declaring two NO groups of two, one
NC group of two and one changeover group of one parses and reports
NO=4 NC=2 SW=1 other=0 total=7, matching the declaration exactly.
tst_contactusage gains a case covering capacity summed across groups
(10 cases, all passing).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
MasterElement::isFull() decided whether a coil had room left with
connected_elements.size() >= max_slaves
which counts linked *elements*. A slave stands for as many contacts as
its "number" kind information declares, so a 4 pole contact consumed a
single contact from the coil's budget instead of four. 36 elements in
the standard collection declare a number between 2 and 4, so this is
reachable, not theoretical.
Add ContactUsage, a header-only tally holding the two rules that are
easy to get wrong:
- a slave counts once per contact it declares, not once per element
- a changeover is counted once, as sw, and never as one NO plus one
NC. CrossRefItem::NOElements() and NCElements() both return
changeovers, so a count built by adding those two lists together
reports one changeover as two contacts.
The upcoming per-type displays (the used count in the element's General
tab, and the per-type budget on the cross reference) need exactly this
count, so it lives in one place rather than being written out three
times, and isFull() now reads it too.
The header carries no graphics dependency, so the counting rules are
unit tested on their own in tests/qttest/tst_contactusage.cpp,
following the same pattern as diagramsortkeys.h.
Verified: all 9 unit tests pass, and both rules were mutation checked
(counting elements instead of contacts fails 2 tests, counting a
changeover as both NO and NC fails 3). The 23 example projects still
load and export without crash or hang, and qet-lint reports no
regressions against its baseline.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Follow-up to the positionKey() fix merged directly in #779
(b2f4ef5d2): per review request, add a small regression test so this
class of bug (fixed-precision "%.4f" formatting compares out of
numeric order once the integer part's digit count differs) can't
silently reappear.
positionKey()/coordinateKey() move out of diagram.cpp's anonymous
namespace into a small header-only diagramsortkeys.h so the test can
link against the exact same code Diagram::toXml() uses, instead of
duplicating the algorithm. Behavior is unchanged.
tst_diagramsortkeys covers: single- vs double-digit, double- vs
triple-digit, negative-vs-negative, negative-vs-positive, and
negative-vs-zero coordinate pairs, plus sub-precision deltas.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
a) using a system provided KF6
b) downloading and compiling KF6
c) using the vendored-in re-creation of the functionality
The behaviour for both Qt5 and Qt6 is steered with the same two variables which were renamed to become version agnostic:
a) BUILD_WITH_KF=ON BUILD_KF=OFF
b) BUILD_WITH_KF=ON BUILD_KF=ON
c) BUILD_WITH_KF=OFF
The version is automatically derived from the chosen Qt major version.