mirror of
https://github.com/qelectrotech/qelectrotech-source-mirror.git
synced 2026-10-23 23:44:13 +02:00
dfec60a3a5
A terminal's label is written as it is read off the plan, "X1:1", and
the symbol draws it as one field. On a long strip that field is long
enough to reach into the next terminal, and a user who wants the number
next to the screw and the label out of the way has no way to say so.
Settings > General > Appearance now has a "Display of the terminal
labelling" group with two choices: the label and its terminal number in
one field, the way it has always been drawn, or the two split. The
first is what every drawing gets, so nothing moves until the user asks
for it, and choosing the other one redraws the drawings already open --
nothing needs to be closed and opened again.
A symbol made for the split carries a text field bound to the new
"Terminal number" information (in the element editor's list, next to
the label, and as the %{terminal_number} variable of a composite text):
the label field then shows "X1" and the number field "1", each placed
where the symbol wants it, and hideable when it must be. A symbol which
has no such field -- every symbol drawn until now -- gets the number on
its own line inside the label field, so switching the setting on can
never make a number vanish, and never needs a symbol to be touched
first. A field which becomes, or stops being, the number field tells
the label fields of its symbol to draw themselves again.
Only the drawing reacts. What the element stores, the numbering, the
sorting in the terminal strip editor, the automatic strip import and
every export keep the whole label: the split is read where the text is
drawn (Element::labelForDisplay() and friends), not where the label is
made.
The new test covers both choices, with and without the number field, a
label with no colon at all, and the way back to the whole label. The
full test suite passes (124/124).